The US Is Going To War Against Russia!

Biden's, and/or The NeoCon-Democrat's, (S)Election Solution - It's War! - By November.

In more ways than I can count, this has been pretty obvious for several months, but because it is such a shocking, and dangerous, and foolish, and utterly death defying decision, I guess that I just couldn’t fully process it.

Before the November Presidential Election, the United States of America will be at war with the Russians, in direct, armed kinetic combat. Primarily in an Air to Air, and Air to Ground, War, but also, with War at Sea, and the limited involvement of ground troops in selective locations and circumstances.

Summary of events-

1. The Plan - Part One: The Ukrainian Op was always as advertised; It was meant to “wear down” the Russian military forces, consume their defensive weapon systems, (especially anti-aircraft/anti-missile), and to weaken their overall resolve. It was also intended to break their economy, with the hundreds of sanctions, and limit their ability to conduct free foreign trade. This last part hasn’t worked, yet, but in an active warfare future, it could, especially if the methods of international trade are destroyed or blockaded militarily.

2. It has also served to get them to commit a large number of combat troops and military assets in the Ukraine SMO. Spread across a lengthy and porous front, far away the from the future hot spots of the larger, future military engagement.

The current granular accuracy of this map, relative to “who controls what” is not critical, it is only critical to note that the Russians are primarily and heavily engaged in the East, and mostly, the Southeast areas of the Ukraine. But to fully understand the relevance, note the following-

3. Currently, Poland is hyper-active with military mobilizations, talks of conscription, adding military informational signs to the roadways, closing and militarizing their border with Belarus (a Russian ally, and essentially a satellite nation with Russian nukes) and saber rattling as loudly as any NATO country, (save for perhaps the UK and Germany) as if they are spoiling for war with Russia.

4. The Baltic States of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia are making very real, very tangible preparations for a hot war along their 210 miles of Russian border, by constructing, primarily defensive, bunkers, over 600 in fact.

5. There have been countless threats and provocations relative to the Russian Exclave (Oblast) of Kaliningrad, and the Russian path of access to the same; The Suwalki Corridor through the borderlands of Poland and Lithuania, via Belarus.

6. Romania has also been goading Russia with some tough talk.

7. The Slovak PM, as recently as Monday, 26 February, stated that “Several NATO and European Union members are considering sending soldiers to Ukraine on a bilateral basis”.

8. New NATO member Finland adds another 830 miles of NATO/Russian borderland to the alliance’s potential frontlines, and exacerbates tensions by subsequently closing that entire border.

9. There is also a lot of chatter about effecting a blockade against Russia, and preventing their free movement in, out, and around the Baltic Sea. There is almost no way to verbalize the level of provocation this theme represents, relative to Russian naval operations, but suffice it to say that this is something that the Russians will go to war to prevent, and/or defeat.

10. As if everything above wasn’t indication enough, we now have news that Canadian Defense Minister Bill Blair has openly stated that Canada is willing to send “non-combat” troops to the Ukraine, “under the right conditions”.

11. Germany and the UK have both signed military agreements with the Ukraine, outside of the confines of NATO.

The Plan - Part Two: One of the most perplexing aspects of this two year long affair, has been the countless attempts by Western Powers to provoke the Russians into a level of untenable escalation. It’s been quite obvious, that for some rather obscure reasons, NATO and the West, has wanted the Russians to “lash-out”, or over-play their hand, or extend themselves too far.

The Russians, and Putin specifically, have resisted these provocations, and shown a nearly inexplicable level of patience and discipline, all the while, increasing their munitions manufacture, their troop mobilizations, and military industrial capacity.

At this point, I think it is fair to say that Putin had a much better understanding of “the long game” than any of us gave him credit. The Russian prosecution of their Special Military Operation has seemed, to many, as overly tepid, excruciatingly slow paced, and bizarrely constrained in it’s application of forces and firepower.

Most have mistaken this for incompetence on behalf of; The Russian military prowess, strategic and tactical leadership, or Putin’s personal resolve. All the while, Putin has been saying that he was preparing for a much more broad, and longer conflict. He resisted every attempt to get him to militarily engage NATO assets or nations, even basically ignoring the destruction of 3 of the 4 Nord Stream pipelines, and the multiple attacks on the bridge to Crimea, and the attacks deep into Mother Russia… but why? Why did he remain so patient and reserved?

Because he knew that a larger war was inevitable, and now that has become apparent to everyone!

The Plan - Part Three: We’re going to need a false flag event to draw additional nations into the fight. This is the big event that I see coming, and eluded to in the past.

NATO and the US want to keep this conflict conventional, which is why Putin and Medvedev, keep emphasizing their nuclear arsenal to the world, intimating that they do not necessarily have the same ideas. With Eastern Russia now fully encircled with hostile NATO member nations, and with them being partially bogged down in eastern and southeastern Ukraine, their entire western border is exposed, especially to airborne attacks, i.e. F-35’s and the like.

After whatever event it takes, to justify troop insertions into western Ukraine, the New Big War is officially underway!

The Plan - Part Four: Looking back on the events of WWI and WWII, the US has a pretty obvious track record when it comes to intervening in European wars- Let the European nations die in the short and medium term, fighting a war of attrition, thereby weakening friend and foe alike, then swoop in at the end, to mop up, claim the glory, and collect the spoils!

Ukraine has already played their role nicely, but they aren’t done for yet. After the false flag event, Polish troops will enter the western side of Ukraine, and take the place of the Ukrainian troops guarding the border of Belarus and north central Ukraine along the Russian border, while also protecting the Ukrainian flank. This will free up the remainder of Ukrainian troops to re-engage the Russian on the front lines of the SMO in eastern Ukraine, keeping them engaged.

Romanian troops may also enter, providing a similar bulwark in the southern side, especially near Transnistria’s northern border.

At that point, pretty much anything the Russians do will trigger Article 5 of NATO. If they attempt to expand the land bridge to Kaliningrad, they will be accused of “invading” Polish and Lithuanian sovereign territory. Attempting to reach it via the Baltic Sea will meet with NATO nation air attacks, seaborne battles, and open yet another strategic front. They cannot work to flank the Poles without using Belarus, and opening an additional front there. They could always invade the Baltic States, (Article 5) to regain additional access to the Baltic Sea, but that presents even more problems. They could consider going even further north, to invade Finland, Sweden, or parts of Norway, in effort to further encircle the Baltic Sea, but this too triggers Article 5, and doesn’t give them the type of warm water port access that they really need.

Even their efforts to engage fully in the Baltic Sea, by air, is partially impeded by the airspace of the three Baltic States, and Poland, and would force them to fly almost exclusively over the aerospace of Saint Petersburg, and enter the skies above the Baltic Sea via a very narrow, and predictable corridor.

My point- They are already fairly well boxed-in on the Western border from north to south!

Thus, they are more or less forced, to fight entirely in Ukraine, lest they trigger Article 5 of NATO, and bring all 31 countries (maybe 32 by then) into the fight.

And just as the US, used and allowed the Russians, to grind down the Germans by the millions, before entering the European Theater of WWII, we will allow the Ukrainians, the Poles, the Romanians, and possibly, the Germans, English, and French, to do the same to Russia, before we swoop in to “finish them off”.

Will this work? Frankly, there is no way to be sure. If the Russians play ball, and stay conventional, refuse to invade any NATO countries to better shape the strategic battlefield, and comply with The West, by fighting a grueling ground war in the Ukraine, then the answer is probably yes.

However, I don’t believe that will happen, and if it does happen, it won’t be for very long. The Russians know that they could roll over the Baltic States in a matter of days, and they also have nukes in Kaliningrad. Finland, Sweden and Norway, are more difficult, but in their case, Russia doesn’t need to conquer and occupy their entire landmass, just a few strategic inroads to the Baltic Sea, and enough to better protect their northwestern flank from incursions by the air.

Moreover, this is less a question of “Will it work?”, as it is a question of “Will The West go for it?” And the answer to that question is a resounding “YES!”

The West has laid all of the groundwork, and now they just need one good false flag event to kick start this plan.

Why will The West do this?

1. They think they can beat the Russians in a coordinated and conventionally contained war. If it goes the way they want it, they are probably correct. It’s a big gamble.

2. It will give almost all of The Nations of The West, an active “State of War” domestically, so they can squelch all voices of dissent as “agents of Putin”, or “Russian Sympathizers”, or for “giving aid and comfort to the enemy”. This fuels Internet censorship, the outright arrest of all loud, dissenting voices, and will initiate the war time propaganda machines, to manufacture consent, and crush all dissent. The benefits of this ploy is obvious.

3. It is further grounds to suspend elections, or hold them in tilted environments that resist any unbiased coverage, anywhere, as all dissent, is now “anti-patriotic” and criminal.

4. If all goes to plan, Putin goes away, and The West can install a puppet government, gaining access to all of that cheap and plentiful Russian energy, to re-invigorate Europe’s industrial base. Also, one of the largest impediments to Western Global Hegemony will be forever eliminated!

5. This will take the “R” out of BRICS, and further isolate China and Iran.

What will China do? There is no telling! Perhaps come to Russia’s aid, or maybe they just make their play for Taiwan. Which will not be easy, because if the entire Navies of Europe are engaged in the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, and the North Atlantic, the US fleet can concentrate it’s efforts on keeping China in check, while Russia is destroyed.

What will Iran do? Most likely, not much, We can pretty much savage Iran from the air, using missiles, attack aircraft, and strategic bombers, anytime that we want, with fairly minimal risks, and Iran knows it.

What will the other B(R)ICS nations do? Nothing at all. Brazil is inert and meaningless, India is servile, China could offer a complete trade embargo, but that hurts them as much as it hurts us, and South Africa isn’t even worth talking about. Besides, while watching the second or third largest military on the planet being decimated, what choice do these countries have except to stand by silently, and watch it unfold?

That is to say, UNLESS THEY ALL BAND TOGETHER, AND START WORLD WAR III!!

Final Point- What’s to keep Russia from going nuclear? Answer: Nothing! There is NOTHING to keep Russia from going nuclear. There is nothing to prevent them from going strategic either, like using their nuclear submarines and atomic torpedoes to send a tidal wave over London and New York.

This is the gamble, and if we win the war, we lose the gamble. If we lose the war, we might still win the gamble.

I’d prepare for either outcome, because we are definitely going to war, we’ll be in it before November, and after that, everything else is anybody’s guess…